Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: viper who wrote (7966)	4/8/1998 2:38:00 AM
From: Martin E. Frankel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Viper/Valentine: I never assume, Sir. The word was "presume." And you continue to play a word game once again. << Never assume my friend or foe....nonono >> "nonono" to what? No, don't assume? No, I have no relationship with the entities questioned in your (my) post to you? Contrary to your possible misconception, there are Federal regulations pertaining to nondisclosure. The courtesy of a prompt, accurate and uncouched response would be appreciated. I "presume" you will be back online around opening time and for the rest of trading hours.

To: viper who wrote (7966)	4/9/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 10836

Viper, Valentine, Moot. Give us your real names and addresses so we can send you basket of food after Gomez comes down with her decision on the 13th giving the whole shebang to Crystallex. I figure a sturdy cardboard box, a whole bunch of quarters for the laundry, a sleeping bag, a tea cup, and some foot powder should do it. You can shave at the bus station and hang your suit in a dry manhole in a new housing area. With some phony ID you should be able to get a job giving out leaflets and work your way back into society. Just forget that 2 million dollars stock broker debt. They cannot touch you with bankruptcy law now. BTW, that is E-T-H-I-C-S. Never mind the meaning for now, but they do give night courses on it. Forget the "ethics for lawyers" course, it's just for reference in case they have to explain breaches to clients, it stops short of "honesty pays".