Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: P. Ramamoorthy who wrote (10844)	4/8/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: TEDennis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13949

Re: CA/SYNT ... If I owned 86% of a "baby" company that has quadrupled in value in a few months, and a "papa bear" the size of CA came along with an offer to buy at a 50% premium ... I'd sign on the bottom line and spend the rest of my life being pampered by servants in my oceanside villa. I'm very fond of peeled grapes. TED

To: P. Ramamoorthy who wrote (10844)	4/8/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 13949

When it's duck hunting season, it doesn't pay to be a duck, any duck... Yesterday I wrote: However, I do see a pattern. When PTUS was downgraded and tanked, PTUS issued a press release and was kicked down further. When VIAS was downgraded and tanked, VIAS issued a press release and was hit yet again. Now CHRZ issues a press release, albeit a positive one, and they get sent to the canvas. Moral: if you are a Y2K company, lay low until this whole thing blows by. Last night SEEC quacked. According to form, they are down 7% in another day that has started off in a sea of red for Y2K companies. - Jeff