SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : METRICOM - Wireless Data Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary Batroff who wrote (685)4/8/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: Chip Anderson  Respond to of 3376
 
Here's MCOM's answer to a question frequently asked on
this thread - this is from Ricochet's "unwired"
subscriber newsletter:

=========

To better help you understand the process, we thought
we'd share some of the basic steps we go through in
order to deploy our network in Any City, USA.

Step 1- Determine who owns each light
pole and fixture so we can rent the space
to install our radio transceivers. Sounds
simple, but the poles can be owned by
more than one entity, and pole ownership
records may, sometimes, be hard to come
by.

Step 2- Educate city/county officials
about Ricochet. We've found that one of
the biggest issues is not so much
negotiating a rental agreement, but
educating public officials about what
Ricochet is and how it benefits their
citizens. Local governmental officials want
to make informed decisions; their
responsibility to their constituents is taken
very seriously, as it should be.
Occasionally, that means the education
process can take a while. Once a city
manager or other representative is on
board, there's still a final approval process
from the city, county or municipality,
which again, takes time.

Step 3- Deployment. Once we've
gathered all the proper permits, it's time to
install the radios. Ironically, after what can
be months of negotiating and piles of red
tape, the installation process is really quite
simple. It only takes about fifteen minutes
per poletop.

So now you know what it takes to bring Ricochet to
cities and counties around the country. What can you
do to help? Since public officials want to serve their
citizens, let them know you want the freedom and
flexibility of computing with Ricochet. And rest assured,
we'll keep doing our part to expand the Ricochet
network as far and as fast as we can.

=========
Chip
coolhistory.com



To: Gary Batroff who wrote (685)4/8/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: david waitt  Respond to of 3376
 
Gary Asks: If you got the licenses to 'SUPPLEMENT the Autobahn spectrum', how much better performance does that mean in those cities which are supplemented?

Well, this is a good question. and I do not want to appear to be dodging it, but, I am not exactly sure. The AB network architecture was well along when the spectrum was purchased. So the system design of the AB network should meet the data rates we are aiming for without WCS.

Incorporation of the WCS spectrum into the AB system design is moving along, ( the AB network design is further along since WCS came along later) but it is not at the point where I would feel comfortable saying that we will see a XX kbps increase in the cities where we are using the WCS spectrum.

Sorry for the vagueness, but I just do not know yet!

david



To: Gary Batroff who wrote (685)4/13/1998 2:21:00 AM
From: Raven McCloud  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3376
 
David,

I'm new to this board. As I've just returned from two weeks vacation in the South West in my 25' trailer and no internet connection, I'm very interested in the following: Has MCOM considered the potential market for RV campgrounds? It could be a HUGE mkt. I would give anything, well not anything, but I'd consider paying handsomely for the opportunity to access the internet (particularly to check on my portfolio and possibly even do some trading) while basking in the SW sun amongst some beautiful scenery! I really think some mkt research should be done in this area if it hasn't already.

I'm considering becoming a subscriber, however, the 28.8 speed is a big deterent. When might we expect much higher speeds (how high?) in the SF Bay Area?

Thanks David!

Michael