Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13112)	4/8/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

First of all we are talking adultery. "Sex" does not convey the essence. Adultery is wrong whether you believe it or not. Second, you seem to equate adultery with divorce. Obviously, they are two different matters. If Mr. Clinton was divorced, the Lewinsky matter might not be an issue (except for the obvious sexual harassment/employment aspect). Third, my obsession is not with sex. That's how you would like to discount and label it. My concern is that it is not appropriate to have a lying adulterer as President. Especially one who seems to have committed perjury, suborned perjury and obstructed justice. JLA