SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Peruvian Gold Ltd. PVO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rolly who wrote (532)4/9/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: Robert Dydo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 892
 
And story continues:
Peruvian responds to Bradbury re Gabriel control acquisition

Peruvian Gold Limited PVO
Shares issued 14,227,466 Apr 8 close $0.70
Thu 9 Apr 98 News Release
Also Gabriel Resources Ltd (GBU)
Also Bradstone Equity Partners Inc (BEP.A)
Mr David Henstridge of Peruvian Gold reports
Contrary to the release of Bradstone Equity Partners which appeared in
Stockwatch April 9 1998, the purpose of Peruvian Gold's takeover bid for
Gabriel Resources is to enable the company to acquire control of Gabriel's
seven Romanian gold properties, including one property with an indicated
gold resource in excess of two million ounces. In the opinion of Peruvian's
board of directors, this acquisition represents an outstanding opportunity.
Since early 1997, Peruvian has been engaged in an exhaustive search for an
appropriate acquisition on which to deploy its financial resources. During
this period, it reviewed numerous potential transactions and concluded that
Gabriel represents the best opportunity available.
The bid was supported by management's review of all available data on the
Romanian properties and a site inspection, independent geological reports,
independent legal review and a fairness opinion to the directors of the
company on the transaction by C.M. Oliver. The fairness opinion concluded,
based on CMO's analysis, that the exchange of 1.4 shares of Peruvian for
1.0 share of Gabriel is fair from a financial point of view to the
shareholders of Peruvian. In addition, Gabriel's directors received a
fairness opinion from Goepel McDermid to the same effect as CMO's opinion.
During the course of its negotiations with Gabriel, Peruvian was informed
that should it not conclude a transaction with Gabriel in a timely manner,
Gabriel would seek alternate sources of financing for its projects.
Successful conclusion of the takeover bid will allow exploration work on
the Romanian projects to proceed on a timely basis.
Contrary to the Bradstone news release, the transaction is not a
disposition of Peruvian's assets. It is an acquisition of new assets and
there will be no change in the business of Peruvian as a result of the
successful completion of the bid. Peruvian will continue in the mineral
exploration and development business.
Shareholder approval is not required. The imposition of such a requirement
would preclude Peruvian from pursuing the opportunity due to Gabriel's
timing requirements.
The boards of directors of each of Gabriel and Peruvian negotiated the
commercial terms of the takeover bid at arm's length to the other company
and its insiders. There are no common directors, officers, greater than 10%
shareholders or other insiders known to management of Peruvian.
In late 1997, Bradstone approached Peruvian with a business proposal. In
the opinion of Peruvian's directors, Bradstone's proposal was without any
merit and was contrary to the best interests of the company. Prior to
making the Gabriel bid, Peruvian invited Bradstone to make any other
proposals it might have. No reasonable proposal was forthcoming.