Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Tuck who wrote (52508)	4/9/1998 2:08:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Richard - Re: "Just thought I would add my noise to the cacophony..." I like your anti-AMD/Pro Intel stance on the AMD thread better than your Pro-AMD/Anti-Intel spiel on this thread. Summing it all up, however, I'm forced to believe that you are actually as confused as you sound. Paul

To: Richard Tuck who wrote (52508)	4/9/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: f.simons	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

As between Intel and AMD, who has the cash for a price war? If Intel were to price the 333 PII below the K6, who would buy the K6? Who would fall out first in this scenario?

To: Richard Tuck who wrote (52508)	4/10/1998 2:17:00 PM
From: Sonki	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Richard, <thought I would add my noise to the cacophony...> you bring up reasonable discussions and don't mean to imply u r making noise. I think AMD is great STOCK(for traders) but INTEL is a great COMPANY, and since I am not the world's best trader I stick to what works for me. If intel wants to go to $50 on it's way 137.00 ...and then to $400 in 10yrs, then that is just fine w. me. but i am willing to bet real money it will not goto $50. are u willing to bet? no harm done...in making noise, while I am dreaming. Please check back w. me next yr.