Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cartaway resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1539)	4/9/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Winer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2505

Lots of new CWA posts. Had me all excited for the second day in a row! The positive correlation between number of posts and price movement for a given stock is once again disproved.

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1539)	4/9/1998 5:20:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2505

I've had problems applying stochastics to junior stocks, since the price volatility effects the stochastics to much, but agree Bollinger bands help to show a great trend line. In the case of MGJ a back track can be ingnored as it only fell back into the bands. I still like regression trends for juniors... They work great for Gold producers to {ABX}, a gold time to buy delta neutral options. I should, but forgot, to mention that DOW theory requires the Dow Industrial to lead upwards, with the DOW Utility and the Dow transport confirm the uptrend. And sometimes the reverse occurs where the DOW Transport/utility leads the Dow Industries up. And without transports/Utilities you can't apply Dow theory. Have a great weekend everyone!