Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Zalkind who wrote (3308)	4/10/1998 3:24:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 6654

Does anyone have info on a company (recently) that after the reverse split, and after a normal pullback, the stock started on a steady climb? Medicis Pharmaceutical (MDRX) and ToyH(THQI) performed successful reverse splits, but the original shareholders still bought it. TG

To: Paul Zalkind who wrote (3308)	4/10/1998 3:27:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

The other thread, for the non SI people is getting quite a few hits from CVIA shareholders... you guys might want to keep an eye on it also, they are starting to ask some very good questions. But for now just popping in and letting us know there are others following this stock very closely. ragingbull.com Here is a question that was brought up, that is a relevant concern AUTHOR : in2deep_98 DATE: Friday, 10 April 1998, at 2:24 p.m. IN RESPONSE TO : CVIA its future and its upcoming mergers, posted by King KAA VIII on Thursday, 9 April 1998, at 5:33 p.m. Sorry about the last post...damn newbies! A few questions have come to mind while lurking around the SI thread, (lurking hmmm; use that term and I'm reminded of the same description used for Noerthern Pike) Anyway, have there been any comments made that I've missed on the intended market. Are the target takeovers being limited to a state, USA, North America? Are they intending on centralizing management or franchising the establishments in order for each establishment to achieve national recognition? From what I've read, the management team is with WOTD, is there any background on who comprises this team and their past experience in this industry? In my opinion you are all correct in assuming that the automobile will continue to be the predominant mode of transportation in the future, at least until we are all turned into a part of history. Tires and lubricants will still be required even after gasoline has been replaced with alternative fuels for powering vehicles. As for the share price one really has to query the inneficiency of the market in comparison to the trading price of significantly lower quality stocks that are available. For example there is AMCL which has all assets seized and no management trading at .06 to .09....go figure. When the merger is complete and the ball starts rolling towards profitability with a sound business plan this company is destined to become a real competitor in this market. IMO Good luck to all of us, now I'll go back to the weeds to "lurk" NN KAA

To: Paul Zalkind who wrote (3308)	4/10/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: Leroy Chandler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Zalkind: Those company that have succeed in their reverse split are "FEW AND FAR IN BETWEEN". Why risk it? It may work with well establish company, also few well establish company don't waste their time with reverse split. IMO, reverse split work against the shareholder in most cases, JMO. If they really care for the present shareholder that have stood with them in hell and high water they should do a 2 for 1. LOL. There are other better known method to raise fund without reverse split. CVIA need to show the shareholder and future investor that they have the skill and the know how to lift up CVIA, I believe with Keith or Jack it can be accomplish with the other private company that is merging with CVIA. I have no knowledge. LEROY