Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (8072)	4/10/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: RH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Moot, Being a regular reader of the SH thread, I have to say that anyone who was ever 'turfed' had it coming and it wasn't because of a difference of opinion. The credibility of the short side was completely wiped out in my opinion once it came to light that a certain investment thread and e-mail blast service was taking payment to send out negative KRY e-mails. When the negative side continuously posts unsubstantiated accusations and refuses to ever respond to questions about the known facts, there leaves little doubt about who is using hype and who doesn't need it. Just because a few longs are over exuberant doesn't mean a whit one way or the other. RH

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (8072)	4/11/1998 12:45:00 AM
From: Moot	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10836

Juraj (Yuri) Krajci, RH, All Yuri: That, sir, is your opinion and I accept your right to express it. As for my posts, I will write as much or as little as I like in order to say as much or as little as I like. In case it hasn't occurred to you, you are under no obligation to read all or any of my posts. (It's one of the benefits of citizenship in a free and open society.) RH: I have no doubt that your claim that they 'deserved what they got' would find wide support on Stockhouse and almost as much here. You might even find considerable agreement that everyone labelled a liar, a shorter, a spy, and so on, is guilty as charged. That doesn't make it right. And your suggestion of a little over-exuberance on the part of the longs being acceptable again raises the question of different standards being applied to different people that I addressed in an earlier post. It really can't be that hard to grasp that this is not conducive to a free exchange of ideas and information, can it? You might want to read a little about Nazi Germany to find out what wide support was given to the notion of certain people getting exactly what they deserved. Fascism is fascism. It doesn't come in good and bad flavours. All: I accept the right of each and every individual to express his or her opinion with respect to my verbosity, BS, pompous assedness, or whatever the particular slam might be. I would hope that, digging just a little deeper, contributions to this discussion might be a little more substantive. Regards.