Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13378)	4/11/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Janice, Yes, I've been following all four of those illustrious threads here at SI. I started reading the thread you mention a long time ago and initially thought it had to be joke thread. Well, I guess the joke's on me. BTW, does anyone know where the elusive DH is keeping himself these days? DH has been conspicuously absent. Seeing as how he may have a propensity for mixing plaids and stripes, upon your sage fashion advice, he'd be hard to miss. I wanted to ask him if he'd ever figured out how e-mail works and what e-mail addresses mean. That's so important in his line of work, considering that he is building the software company of the future, don't you think? While I was sitting here. I got to thinking about Keith McM, everybody's favorite stock broker on the TechniClone thread. I wonder what he's up to these days? Holly

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13378)	4/12/1998 2:20:00 AM
From: Ronald Ashkenazy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Janice, regarding: www3.techstocks.com Sadly, I've learned that the same language that documented the birth of this nation, the end of slavery, and heralded the peace after Earth's bloodiest conflict in 1945 is the same language held in derision by you for no reason other than some self-serving drivel: www3.techstocks.com www3.techstocks.com www3.techstocks.com And your contempt for the reader is apparently without concern for rebuke. Indeed, you have even intensified your efforts to violate not only the rules of English, but the rules of this forum as stated by its founder, "eom": www3.techstocks.com I would opine that jabberwocky is best left to creative art forums where the medium equals or exceeds the importance of the message. (Though I personally in no way consider your adolescent misspellings either clever, creative, or worthy of universal adaptation as you advocate.): www3.techstocks.com But please let me not dissuade you from your resolve. Rude behavior has its own eventual rewards, and I am neither the judge, jury, nor executioner. Ron Ashkenazy