Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INFORMATION ANALYSIS (IAIC) - YEAR 2000 Date Remediation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matthew F. Kern who wrote (1447)	4/13/1998 6:53:00 PM
From: _scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2011

Matt, this amateur has noticed that other IAIC experts (e.g., Elliot, Gary, Joe (cage), and maybe even Ted) often ask for your opinion on specific news and future predictions about IAIC related to its product. I'm interested in knowing how & why are you so knowledgeable ? Also, of all the Y2K stocks out there, you guys really seem to focus specifically on IAIC. I realize that at least a short term splash should be had when IAIC a) gets its national NASDAQ listing, b) gets exposure at CA's y2k show c) beats earnings predictions (btw, when are they to be posted ?) But do you really believe that IAIC is going to make a bigger splash than the others longer term ? If so, why ? Thanks scott

To: Matthew F. Kern who wrote (1447)	4/13/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2011

Matt and all: Think about it. One contract a week doesn't cut it. There needs to be two others unannounced for IA to meet revenue projections for profitable quarter, at least if we go by the size they've been announcing so far. I'm not saying they don't exist, of course. We know they do. We need to see the whole story.

To: Matthew F. Kern who wrote (1447)	4/13/1998 9:11:00 PM
From: cage	Respond to of 2011

Matt & Elliot, For what it's worth, in the past, whenever IAIC has a direct hand in contracts announced by CA they mention IAIC's name or email address. That is not to say that what you are saying(Matt) is not so in that IAIC may get revenues from the new product announced by CA(internet/intranet...)through the enhanced usage of CA products that are tied to IAIC products. I do agree with you in that among the many questions to be asked at the CA World Conference, that should be included. Scott, I can only tell you why I ask Matt questions. He has demonstrated to me an acute awareness and knowledge of the technical end of the industry that I can't even begin to come close to. I think it is only a matter of time(a short amount of it) until we see IAIC start to reflect its excellent potential for solid earnings by having its share price move up nicely. As I have said before, IAIC was tied together with some not so super y2k companies due to the ignorance of the street concerning the y2k industry as a whole, and IAIC was made to pay for it. Now IAIC is separating itself from those companies and the street will start to see the difference and make the appropriate changes in their investment strategies. It is sad to say that the world in general has been very slow to become knowledgeable about the y2k significance, and as a result, very slow in attacking the problem. That has caused some surprising lags in some y2k companies amassing contracts, but that is changing, though as was pointed out on earlier posts on this thread, the rest of the world-not counting the USA, is still having trouble awakening to the y2k problem. Have a nice day all. Joe