Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Iceberg who wrote (1607)	4/13/1998 8:13:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1894

Ice, surely you don't recommend all of them? <G> I'd stay away from TANK. Too thinly traded. (2100 sh today) quote.yahoo.com GM

To: Iceberg who wrote (1607)	4/29/1998 10:51:00 AM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1894

Ice, one stock to add to your list is EGGS [Egghead]. GM <eom>

To: Iceberg who wrote (1607)	5/18/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1894

Iceberg - Some of those are "cute" (e.g., MAD, NUN, NUT, etc.), but none of them are as...um....sexy as LUST. My point was that the companies in the oil service sector-- with the exception of MIND and RIG -- all use these plodding, easily forgettable acronyms (CDG, TDW, ESV, etc.). Now, maybe their stock prices would begin to go up again (consistently!) if they could put a little come-hither into their stock symbols. Tell me, honestly, wouldn't you be at least tempted to buy a stock called PORNO? jbe