Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (45423)	4/14/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto, Are you serious? Your presence here in now comedic! You are not a shareholder, you posted that you wish to "punish" the company. You posted that shareholders do not deserve your answers. You have personal relationships with Kugler, Martin & Mork and you post outright lies and misinformation. An example is the calculated and strategic post stating our group is "splintering" HUH??! Who? Bigs and Garry left awhile ago, they are no longer on our list. Without them we have the float in name form with over another million called. Most will not post and encourage me not to waste my time with your garbage. There are still close to 300 shareholders unaccounted for. Our group has shown amazing solidarity and still works in unison. I see none of the B.S. claims you are making about the group splintering, in fact, shareholders are bombarding the TA to get that 1MM shares over the float called into name form. RMIL SHAREHOLDERS AGENDA 1)DEMAND CERTS, FLOAT IS LESS THAN 20K FROM BEING ENTIRELY IN NAme FORM with another 1MM called 2) $10MM 3) 10K 4) trading with float in name form 5) respect for guys like Bigs & Patterson who must do what they feel is best for them 6) NO TOLERANCE for non-shareholders affiliated with shortsellers of RMIL Your post isn't even amusing anymore in its sophmoric attempt to "splinter" the solidarity of this group. Pugs

To: tonto who wrote (45423)	4/14/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 55532

I personally demand a shareholder meeting on behalf of five shareholders. Who would like to join and converge in NY? Riley wouldn't have to move a muscle. I'm being dead serious, Riley. It would be in your best interest, and the cavalry's, and Pugs, and everyone here. We, as the public shareholders, own our company, and we can demand that Gary Morgan and It also might be in Dempsey Mork's best interest to attend also. Randy Baker might show up. Hell, we might even have Giachetti make a guest appearance. Why can't we do this people? Is it not enough money for all of you to worry about? Andy Harrison... would you like to do this(if you're still lurking)? We need feedback on this. Let's get together, and comprise a statement. This is in Riley's best interest, this is in Pugs's best interest, this is in Daddy Bigs's best interest, this is in my best interest. And this is in all of the shareholder's best interests. Tonto, would you show up? Kugler, would you? smartin? Let's get everyone in a room and start throwing punches! I'm being completely serious. We could put an end to the bickering right now, and if there is a short, put a serious damper on things. A representative from the SEC would definitely attend this meeting if we got enough shareholders to matter! Matty Gregg