Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (13580)	4/15/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: DScottD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I guess the veep didn't have any used underwear to donate. We're moving into dangerous territory here. DScottD

To: DMaA who wrote (13580)	4/15/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: John Hensley	Respond to of 20981

Why doesn't the money coming in to pay Clinton's legal defense count as income? They were very clever this time setting up the fund. The first time I think they limited the donations to $500, but this time it's all the way up to $10,000, which just happens to be the limit for being excluded from taxes as a tax free gift per individual.

To: DMaA who wrote (13580)	4/15/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: John Hensley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I found this excerpt from the story very interesting: And even with a vice presidential salary of $171,500, it's possible that the Gores, who pay Harvard University tuition for two of their children and private high school tuition for another, sometimes feel pinched. Here's a guy who doesn't have a mortgage (since they don't itemize), don't pay for food, and don't have car payments. He also somehow was making anywhere from 400,000 to 600,000 per year from 1992 through 1994. And people thought George Bush was out of touch with reality.