SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CLK who wrote (1815)4/16/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: Chip McVickar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3335
 
CLK

I agree with your comments......this news release holds some great promise
for SIR/ERB stock holders.....It is the most public information made
available in the last year....directly relating to the drilling of this
field. Also the activities of the company.
1] core tests were received
2] results indicate conventional gas production from 4 different zones
3] potential production from coals
4] gas storage potentials in sands
5] presentation of technical data in mid May...Salt Lake City
6] shown all collected data to 4 major oil/gas companies
7] evaluation of letters of intent
8] negotiations started with a number of majors for a joint venture agreement
9] anticipates completing an agreement in principle within 60 days
10] conventional test well to confirm the economic gas production of the sands
11] negotiations for joint ventures in Turkey

Why this list.....what are they *not* telling us..?
1] 1st....they have not confirmed the existence of production quantities
of Coal Bed Methane Gas....the major reason for the investment. Only
it's potential.
2] They have not released the core sample technicals

My take...I think they have to use the May Geologist meeting in Utah
(if they go..?) to broadcaste the techical findings of this project.
Remember...."Epic has been *requested* to set up a technical presentation...."

This meeting to me is very important.....there is a lot that has not
been made public....I understand the need to keep the core results to
themselves....but if they do not present these findings or fail to make that
May meeting....new questions should be asked about the potential CBM quantities *potentialy*
present.

This is great news...the May meeting and a signed agreement in 60 days
will begin to definatively prove the quality of this field.
I certainly hope this is more then just a *conventional test well in August*.

Wonder if Alta has enough snow for skiing in May....might be worth
looking into..?
Would like to sit in on that presentation.
Chip