Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (13632)	4/16/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: Sam	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

David, I just read the first few paragraphs of the article, no time to read it all now, will try to later (perhaps). Undoubtedly, he talks about other things later on, but I have to say--I just tune out of the Lewinsky stuff at this point. My feeling is that Clinton was set up, the Jones thing should never have gotten as far as it did, the Lewinsky thing was utterly irrelevant to the Jones thing in the first place, people have basically no "right" to know about anyone's sex life as such--if it has to do violating someone else's rights in some way (a la Packwood), then that is a different story, but that isn't focused on the sex part of it, it is on the violation, the abuse. All the stuff about what we "know" is on the tapes, or occurred in depositions that should have been under seal or that was (or was not) in the proffer (which should also have been confidential)--all that stuff makes me sick, just increases the sense that this is a "talk show" scandal in which there is no participant with anything that might even resemble "principle" whatever, that it is all political BS. To which I say the Jewish Czar's prayer: May G-d bless and keep the Czar (far away from us). Regards, Sam