Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (11623)	4/16/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Mfcheal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 213176

Re: Eric, What (sic) a flaming fool you are. In all fairness, Bill, if there were cyberlitter laws you would be behind bars. Amongst many other long-winded rants, if I remember rightly, you were the one who ran a Hitler Week here a short while back. If there is method in your madness you can't blame people for being cheesed off having to wade through so much drivel in order to find it. Perhaps a little long term consistency from you would be in order. Otherwise you'll be be getting the Most Vacant Poster wards from Mark. Linda: the weather here, in Ireland, is crap. Stay in NY is my advice. Micheal

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (11623)	4/16/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: Scott Crumley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213176

Dear Bill, It almost takes an act of God to get me to respond to your drivel, but slandering Eric Yang has done the trick. The audience I'm addressing here is really the folks that haven't read this thread every single day for a year, or longer. The ones that have, already know the truth. And the truth, simply put, is this. The content of your numerous and lengthy posts over the last year have never served to help the AAPL investors on this thread (with the possible exception of people trading short). On the contrary, they have contained statements about the future that have been proven incorrect, statements containing misinformation that you relate as fact and statements, such as your numerous attacks on Steve Jobs, that on this very day, you have reversed without any reference to your historical stance. And all of this typically mixed into a long winded biography about yourself. In essence, you are the very antithesis of Eric Yang. Eric has concisely and succinctly conveyed some of the most useful information regarding Apple that I have ever witnessed. His website, macevolution.com , not only contains extremely accurate information about Mac hardware, but documents in detail his skill as an analyst regarding AAPL. His analysis of Q2 beat the pros hands down. And he does all this for us, working tirelessly, while asking for nothing in return. The one thing that Eric appears to demand, vehemently, is the truth. And I believe that it is because of this relentless quest for truth, through accurate information and precise analysis, that your posts offend him so. If people were magazines, you would be the National Enquirer and Eric would be Scientific American. If anyone doubts the veracity of these claims, they have but to visit Eric's site and read. Regarding the claims about Bill, one would have to wade through the mire of his historical posts, here on SI (and a painful task that would be). But regardless of the pain, the facts are there, for those that are interested in the truth. Scott