SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckeye who wrote (53716)4/16/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Buckeye, >>>please quit whining . . . the fact that this time around Kurlak was right and you were wrong has nothing to do with his pshychological (is that how you spell it) manipulations . . <<<

Buckeye is it? What is that? A cheap work of art esp. a painting produced rapidly and exclusively for sale - usually thought of as having little or no aethestic interest? Or is that a poorly designed, ostentatious advertisement - bold, loud, or shrill?

Anyhow, with due respect - could you please identify in some specific way - where kurlak was right this time?

Regards,

Mary



To: Buckeye who wrote (53716)4/17/1998 7:22:00 PM
From: Thomas G. Busillo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Buckeye, when Kurlak wins on the merits, I don't have a problem w/ the guy. He made a VERY timely call right before INTC's warning. Like him or not, that was a heck of a call.

My problem is that the guy at times appears to just give it that little extra push in order to win. Case in point, the CNBC report.

There's nothing wrong with wanting to win. We all want to win.
Some of us just don't believe in "winning dirty".

Good trading,

Tom


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News