Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (53725)	4/16/1998 11:53:00 PM
From: nnillionaire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Mary, One guy's opinion that I respect: >http://www.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/main-0 For thought. Good Investing

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (53725)	4/17/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

In case you missed it, INTC missed estimates this quarter. Guess which analyst predicted this? Tom

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (53725)	4/17/1998 10:21:00 PM
From: Buckeye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Hey congrats on getting aesthetic right . . . whoops, sorry you didn't get it right did you . . . maybe if you e mail kurlak and ask real nice he'll send you a dictionary . . . as far as when and where kurlak has been right lately well let's see . . . he did downgrade the stock in August at $98 warning about a weak 1h 98 . . . don't think i'm inferring he's invincible, his next call could be just as wrong as his previous one was right . . . it just seems to me that too many people jump down analysts throats whenever they are wrong and when they are right everyone on these threads who are on the wrong side of the trade scream conspiracy or pshychological (i love that word) manipulations . . . give it up, the guy was right this time