Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (13719)	4/17/1998 8:34:00 AM
From: Jack Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

JLA, (such as Clinton has lied, perjured himself, suborned perjury, obstructed justice, withheld evidence, had an enemies list, misused gov't offices, laundered money, I agree with you that Clinton did all these things, and probably much worse, and that he is a boor and a total phoney. But I still think the Paula Jones thing is a lot of crap, mainly because I don't think people ought to sue for such stuff. And it does serve Clinton right to have undergone all the grief for this accusation, since he and his Democratic/Feminist supporters are largely responsible for the testy workplace nowadays. Boss, don't put your arm around that female emplyee's shoulder as you speak with her. Might be grounds for a lawsuit. Jack

To: jlallen who wrote (13719)	4/17/1998 10:39:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Clinton supporters reasonable inferences however are entitled to total deference without the need for proof, etc. As a lawyer you're surely aware that in criminal cases the burden of proof falls on the accuser.