Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WalleyB who wrote (13743)	4/17/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Oh yes. I think most men genuinely don't realize that good looks in a guy are pretty low on the priority list of most women. Sure, it's nice if your boyfriend or husband is physically attractive, but, like a foreign accent, it's something you don't really notice much of the time. Many guys on this thread have said that women voted for Clinton because he was "handsome". I haven't seen any of the women even agree that he IS; they'd scarcely vote for someone for that reason. Of course "handsome" and "attractive" are two entirely different things: I've known truly ugly guys who were extremely attractive, and handsome ones in whom I felt no interest at all. But as far as Clinton's concerned, I don't know whether I'd consider him attractive or not, as I've never met him.