Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13779)	4/17/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Half the time you use the "He's to smart to have done it" defense and the other half "He's too Dumb to have thought of it". The third half of the time you use "He may have done it but who cares?" and the forth half it's "Whether he did or didn't it's nobody's business". Just wanted you to know I'm listen'n to ya.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13779)	4/17/1998 11:56:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I said I've convicted him. A court hasn't and probably will not because of the perjury, subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, and withholding of evidence the Clinton White House views as normal procedure. As for Ken Starr. it's customary to wait until the investigation is completer prior to presenting your case. Unfortunately for Mr. Clinton as the investigation progresses and more rocks get turned over all kinds of unpleasant things keep slithering out. There's also a difference between being legally "innocent" and actual innocence. Clinton may escape judgment as the former. No reasonable person can believe he is the latter. As to subornation of perjury, he is on tape suborning perjury from Ms. Flowers. I don't doubt he tried it again. He's pretty dumb for not keeping it zipped for the limited time he's in DC. You skipped over obstruction of justice. Too hot to handle? The only reason what we know is not fairly convincing to you is because you will not be convinced until we see Clinton doing his next victim on videotape. Even then I'm sure the tape will be dismissed as part of the vast right wing conspiracy. JLA PS You are right about lying not being a crime, except when its in the course of a judicial proceeding. We also ought to have higher aspirations for the President.