Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DScottD who wrote (13782)	4/17/1998 2:29:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

>>How come Willey waited 4-1/2 years to go public with her story? Easy. Willey never wanted it public, but after she was compelled to testify via deposition and the news was out, she determined to tell the truth nationally as the Clinton goon squad were going to trash her anyway. In short order they did not only that but they put her "friend" on the payroll. >>When it comes time to try the man I will pay attention and evaluate the evidence presented with an open mind. Until then, all we have is conjecture, rumors and innuendo which, at least in my opinion, feeble and unreasoned as it may be, add up to nothing. Gee, are you saying you can't come to an informed opinion without a court telling you? You must understand that courts do not deal in truth, they deal in legal guilt or innocence. What do statutes of limitations have to do with truth? It would be bizarre to conclude for instance that because Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot escaped legal judgment that they cannot be "judged" outside a court of law to have be mass murderers.