Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (13795)	4/17/1998 3:01:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 20981

The friend changed her story and was paid $7000 in short order by a Kendall's National Enquirer for a picture that was not unique. Kendall serves the National Review (and a number of other publications) in the same capacity. Irrelevant. Tweaking an ex-boyfriend is not blackmail. Often it is: the idea is to force him to stay with her, to change plans that don't please her, to pay more attention to her. Not criminal blackmail, no, but emotional, certainly. Women either do or don't use sex as a weapon; if this story's true, Willey does. And that's contemptible. Funny, the truth is that Willey turned down the offer when Dove books owner made clear that he wanted a story friendly to Clinton, i.e., he wanted Willey to lie. My understanding is that he simply refused to pay her 300K, because what she had to say wasn't worth it. He offered 50, she refused.