Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DScottD who wrote (13798)	4/17/1998 3:02:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>So far, everything that's come out on this case has been selectively leaked. Absolutely wrong. Much has come out as a consequence of the motion for summary J and the response which contained pleadings and the Tripp tapes which Newsweek has. AT least 10 people have testified under oath that Clinton lied in the PJ case alone. >>And Statutes of Limitation have everything to do with the truth. Not at all - they are a device to limit the legal process even if it denies that the truth will come out. >>>>It would be bizarre to conclude for instance that because Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot escaped legal judgment that they cannot be "judged" outside a court of law to have be mass murderers.<< To equate this with Hitler, et al is sickening. No one equated it with Hitler except you. I used that trio as an example that people come to informed judgments all the time outside of the legal process. You made that invidious non sequitur because it destroyed your "see no evil" argument.

To: DScottD who wrote (13798)	4/17/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Perhaps you didn't have the opportunity to read William Bennett's piece on "What We Know"?