Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DScottD who wrote (13807)	4/17/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

What you stated was: When it comes time to try the man I will pay attention and evaluate the evidence presented with an open mind. Fine, but the Clintonistas want to deny you that opportunity. Maybe they know something. >>Until then, all we have is conjecture, rumors and innuendo which, at least in my opinion, feeble and unreasoned as it may be, add up to nothing. That may be your opinion but that's not the case: techstocks.com

To: DScottD who wrote (13807)	4/17/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

"I said that, in this case, I (and apparently Janice and I stand alone here) could not because I question the reliability of what's been reported." No you aren't alone. I only post sporadically though. There are a few others who post here as well who I think believe the same. But most of us don't have the time or energy to keep with the Clinton bashers.

To: DScottD who wrote (13807)	4/17/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 20981

I lost track. Which of the hundreds of cases swirling around the boy is This Case?