Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ShoppinTheNet who wrote (11968)	4/18/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

SK, I think there is only one way to overcome the past(this is only my opinion, obviously)and that is to be unconcerned with EVERYTHING, including the current market price of naxos, with one exception. They have to concentrate on getting good solid numbers out in as timely a fashion as possible, and continue to keep the market place informed of the general plan as we move forward. that does not mean that they have to tell us the day to day minutiae of what is going on, just to satisfy our raging curiousity and need to know. It doesnt mean that they should be totally unconcerned with the share price. It DOES mean that they should focus on the type of good solid long range goals that are going to get us to where we want to be, without comprimising because a lot of us shareholders are getting nervous and bitching. EVERYTHING going forward depends on one thing, and one thing only. Good numbers. Every issue flows from that one single piece of the puzzle. If we keep putting out the numbers, eventually, we will reach a critical mass where the marketplace will no longer ignore us. the questin, that no one knows the answer to is how many holes will that take. One more, five more, ten more, or twenty more? No one knows. I have my opinion, but it is meaningless and not even worth mentioning because it by definiiton can not be based on any fact whatsoever. If we give the company the time to get us the answers to "what amount of PM's are contained in FL?" then we will know the answer to weather or not this is a good investment. It is also the only path, IMO, to credibility for the company. I can guarantee you that the market place only cares about hard facts and not supposition to the answers to that question. Becasue of our checkered past, we will be forced to a higher criteria than others. It may or may not be fair, but it IS the current reality that we have to deal with. JMHO, mark