Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13941)	4/18/1998 3:43:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

I think the real point behind the strategy of indicting Monica is that she does not seem like a young woman who is willing to be toast, and that indicting her would effectively get Clinton. Ginzburg has said that she is not going to take the fall for him, although he used different words. Monic is no Susan McDougal, for sure!! It seems like maybe this is the only way to get the truth out of her, as to who gave her the talking points. This seems to be the area Starr believes she is fudging about, and my understanding is that this is why he didn't grant her immunity.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13941)	4/18/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Unless, to avoid the jail time she finally told the truth and give up Mr. Clinton and/or Jordan. I agree with you in one aspect in that I don't think that Mr. Clinton would do the dirty work himself. Its been my supposition all along that Vernon Jordan rather than Ms. Lewinski is the real "prize" the prosecutor is after. If he gets to Mr. Jordan he may crack all the Clinton scandals wide open especially, Whitewater and campaign finance. Mr. Jordan always seems to be there when someone needs to be kept on the Clinton team (i.e., Monica, Web Hubbell). JLA