Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (13952)	4/18/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Janice, one thing I have a hard time believing is that Clinton did not suborn perjury. It seems almost incredible that Monica was acting on her own. Do you remember when Monica's mother offered Tripp money if she would go away with her feigned foot injury and avoid testifying? Or that Monica offered Tripp half her condo in Australia for the same thing? These sound like the actions of someone who is desperately trying to protect Clinton, I agree. But because he has not tried to pin almost everything on Betty Currie, which is in itself almost hilarious, I think the most logical conclusion is that he is very skillful at manipulating people to protect him. Maybe an attorney can deal with whether Monica changing her story would be credible after being indicted. Doesn't it happen pretty frequently?