SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (26027)4/19/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33344
 
Scumbria - Re :'Without a scalable MP architecture it will be impossible to keep up with the performance demands of the next decade. Intel's competitors would be well served to wake up to this fact."

Do you mean Intel, with built-in SMP support on their Pentium Pro/Pentium II lines, was "ahead of the competition" in this architectural feature?

I suppose you can figure put whose processors are being designed into MP/SMP applications - and these use TWO OR MORE CPus per application.

Paul



To: Scumbria who wrote (26027)4/19/1998 4:16:00 PM
From: Gregory  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33344
 
Is not a scumbria long gone fish enjoyed by happy odessites?
Anyway, if you did taste it sometime in your childhood you should have s special extrac sence to detect good and bad food?

Do you think NSM ia a long or a short?



To: Scumbria who wrote (26027)4/19/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33344
 
RE:Without a scalable MP architecture it will be impossible to keep up with the performance demands of the next decade. Intel's competitors would be well served to wake up to this fact.

Do you know which markets Intel's competitors are targeting Scumbria? It doesn't appear so, based on this note. Don't let me down man. I want to hear the full story on this new theory you have. Scalable MP blah, blah... Silly.

Bob