Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (5655)	4/20/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: Brian Hutcheson	Respond to of 6843

Kenneth , re. understand why people with high education stoop so low You can educate people in all branches of science but you cannot teach them common sense . Some of the most learned people are very eccentric in other facets of life . Yousef and Paul are just 2 examples , Brian

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (5655)	4/20/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 6843

Kenith even worse than that. He knows that he can not affect stock prices in any shape or form. He posts here to annoy shareholders of the company that is the cause of Intel's problems. Regards -Albert

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (5655)	4/21/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: Time Traveler	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6843

My AMD sales representative, who is a very good friend of mine, is very gung-ho over this stock. He absolutely believed that the K6 yield has been solved. However, upon confrontation, he failed to answer why there are only 1.55M K6 produced this quarter (Q1'98) vs. 1.50M of Q4'97. The projected number of K6 produced does not help either. Instead, the projected numbers reflect the die-increase of 0.25um given the same yield as 0.35um with a little ramp-up. Can you explain that one? Why the production of K6 not exponential if the yield is solved? Time Traveler By the way, LLTC != Lattice. LLTC is my competitor, yet I chose to invest in them after encountering their products in the field. And your personal attacks on Xy really makes me laugh.