Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IMES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ivan solotaroff who wrote (1633)	4/20/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: don denson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1901

Ivan, Ivan, Ivan: Everyone here has an agenda. There's the rub. I like Frank personally. He's the kind of guy that has made IMS what it is. But he has his cares along with the rest of us. Wish he didn't have to fade the heat due others in the executive suites. No threat by that- just hope they are reading the tea leaves (ie, the current trading going on). (and that reminds me, Stern: put his muzzle back on, things are looking a bit better! over-) Say Ivan, its good to have your erudition back here. Have you joined us for the fight? or, just lurking for the S. opera? DD

To: ivan solotaroff who wrote (1633)	4/20/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: Thos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1901

They can read to you as you wish, tovarisch, but what you mean by "having an agenda" is equally opaque. Had you read my postings, and been watching this thread, you would know exactly what my position is, and further you would have recognized the areas that Frank consistently evades as being central to this whole issue. Simply stating and re-stating the view that the car salesman posed that the IMES IP is worth $500k, and could be re-produced by any team of engineers - is what I suggested. An opinion. Period. The fact that it is pandering to a particular source that we all recognize as highly suspicious, puts the level of the opinion down near that third standard deviation I mentioned. No I'm not a techie, but I do understand the overall parameters - in outline, which is sufficient - given my very useful input from other sources. What that has definitively indicated, as if the circumstances of the past three to five months weren't enough, was to portray this character Frank as deliberately divisive, consciously misinformative, and no doubt happily watching the shareholders group beat up on each other. It's not used very much anymore but the term shill springs to mind. You want to read what this all about, do so. If you have a legitimate question thereafter. pose it. You want add dimensions to the shill element, skip it.