Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV -- Good Prospects? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (5595)	4/20/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: MFDoh!	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7703

Answers (some) to xyzebra's questions: I am only allowed (according to my terms of usage) to divulge the following information... Where was the phone call made to? (from to) San Fransisco,CA,USA to London,UK What hardware used? Intel based computers to initiate / receive the call. H.323 enhanced stack. European stack vendor. Gatekeeper compatible. What software used? Net-meeting Was it a first try-out? Yes Or a fully configured system on both ends? I dont understand this question completely. If you mean whether both origin and destination ends of the call were configured by the same integrator, the answer is yes. Was this a sample in an expo booth? or an actual "sold" product? "trial" user license with certain non disclosure bindings Did they have "controls" (like those FTEL has) to regulate latency/quality? i did not have the chance to actually fiddle with the gateway. Net-meeting does not support these features in any significantly obvious way. Any other comments. 25 calls were placed simultaneoulsy (same origin and destination). Duration of each call was 12 minutes. I could barely understand London. Was this through the DGIV network or? It was not DGIV :) Hope this information helps. Thats pretty much all the details I have. Cheers MFDoh! out