>>The specter on this thread that if your not one of the soothsayers or one brings a LEGITIMATE question or concern forward for consideration that is in any way cautionary or negative - you get jumped on and told to "sell" or "get real" is disturbing. As a shareholder, I have the right and the responsibility to question ALL moves by MY company. The announcement, Slaters and my comments provoked discussion and some info sharing which is WHAT this thread is here for NOT to beat up the contributors.<<
Amen..
My views of market hesitation was met with the exact same sentiment, frankly I do not care a rat's arse, since all it happened in my eyes was, I lost all value not on the company but on the thread itself as a place to "debate" valid ideas, including concerns.
i.e. The zealots always lose.
>>Would like hear opinions as to why little or no street reaction yet to the announcemet<<
In my opinion, The market as of several weeks now (approx since mid January), has stopped believing in the FTEL story, at least for the time being.
Like it or not, technology or not, FTEL is a bb stock, what it may become or not, for the time being is irrelevant if the market does not believe it, not my opinion, simply my interpretation of what I see in the charts.
Hence, the story and the news matters more than what most think. Under such scenario, the idea of a stealth PR firm is questionable, such characteristic (stealth) has validity under a different scenario, not the present one.
Bottom line, no factual news, no street attention, besides, in some cases, such arrogant attitude, of If you do not like it "sell", it does not help.
I will attack those who claim FTEL is a piece of doodoo, based on a mere personal desire to short it etc.
But if there are valid arguments supported by factual evidence, and such analysis meets the same arrogance, then I simply say, well p...on you, i will indeed heed your advice and sell.
By the time you figure out your "whatever the hell is it that ails you" I will come back and buy some more, so what if I did not get it at 3.25 or at 3.50.
What matters is that from the point of your purchase it goes up, not sideways, to down. It is a matter of "opportunity cost". As the chart looks today, it is very close to what it looked a year ago, each one draw their own conclusions.
It is also suicidal to be arrogant toward those who in the past have supported the stock, do you have any idea how many stocks there are out there one can invest the money?
Any way, I do not want to ride it, personally, if no factual news come out,the probabilities to go under need $3.00 increase, at such point depending what the chart looks like and the other indicators tell me, I will look again.... Unless of course I find something even more attractive.
I am in the stock market, not to "worship" stocks. Do I have admiration for the scientists that work at FTEL, of course I do, but as much as I admire them, such admiration will not make the price go up. And yes, I am here with such expectation.
As they say, you want a friend.... get a dog!, and a stuffed one at that because live ones, have fleas and to boot, they shit. who cleans it...?
Hold your wrath flame boys, I will just click on next, besides, some one ask, so I responded
To those who flame me, I will say this:
kli.org
(it is in Klingon, so you figure it out)
Z.
Wisdom becomes nonsense in the mouth of a fanatic.
~ Otto Schuwdrmer ~ |
