SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sand wedge who wrote (19950)4/22/1998 8:32:00 AM
From: Teddy  Respond to of 95453
 
The Wall Street Urinal -- April 22, 1998 Bangladesh Fires Up First Private Project

---
Natural-Gas Field Is Meant to Lure Foreign Investment
----

By Jonathan Karp
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

NEW DELHI -- Bangladesh is set to open the tap at its first privately
developed natural-gas field, a flagship project in this impoverished country's
attempt to woo foreign investment and fuel rapid economic growth.

The offshore Sangu Development Project, in the Bay of Bengal, begins trial
production today, leading to commercial gas production and supply within a
month. The $264 million venture is led by Cairn Energy PLC of Scotland,
and the consortium includes units of Dallas-based Halliburton Co. and
Anglo-Dutch conglomerate Royal Dutch/Shell Group.

Exploiting recently discovered natural gas reserves could propel
Bangladesh, home to 120 million people, from being one of Asia's most
troubled economies into one of its most vibrant. Many hurdles remain, but
the government's decision to open up the promising energy industry has
lured leading global investors.

U.S.-based Occidental Petroleum Corp. is expected to start commercial
gas production in northeastern Bangladesh this year, and other international
energy firms have bid to develop gas fields, including Chevron Corp., Mobil
Corp. and Malaysia's state oil company, Petronas Carigali Sdn. Bhd.

The energy potential has caught the attention of President Clinton, who has
added Bangladesh to his planned South Asian visit later this year, largely to
promote U.S. investment, diplomats say. Talks between a U.S. delegation
led by U.N. Ambassador Bill Richardson and Bangladeshi leaders last
week in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, focused on U.S. investment in
oil, gas and power.

Because of natural-gas ventures, U.S. investment in Bangladesh is poised to
leap to $250 million by year end, a tenfold increase from just a few years
ago. Also, hundreds of millions of dollars of power plants, oil and gas
pipelines and container ports are under discussion, along with manufacturing
projects by Japanese and South Korean investors. "There are a lot of
projects in a holding pattern waiting to land," says a foreign official in
Dhaka.

Energy is Bangladesh's big draw. Confirmed natural-gas reserves are about
11 trillion cubic feet. Conservative estimates say Bangladesh could have 30
trillion cubic feet to 50 trillion cubic feet, while the most optimistic estimates
by private firms reach 80 trillion cubic feet. That is far less than the reserves
of natural-gas powers such as Russia but comparable to other promising
producers such as Indonesia.

The Cairn-led venture is one of eight projects privately negotiated with the
Bangladeshi government. Dhaka offered tenders for 15 additional blocks
last year, receiving bids for 12. But the awarding of contracts has been
bogged down by red tape and by bureaucrats who are inexperienced at
handling such large deals.

Ultimately, the success of Bangladesh's energy industry will depend on
cooperation in a region long beset by tensions and military conflicts. India is
the logical export market for Bangladesh's natural gas, but selling across the
border is often a touchy political issue in Bangladesh's fractured democracy.

India helped Bangladesh gain independence from Pakistan in 1971, but
relations soured afterward because of Dhaka's concerns about regional
domination by India. Recently, the two countries have started rebuilding
trust through watersharing and commercial agreements. U.S. diplomats say
they hope to convince Bangladeshi officials of the benefits of selling natural
gas to India.



To: sand wedge who wrote (19950)4/22/1998 8:34:00 AM
From: marc chatman  Respond to of 95453
 
June Brent -5› to $14.46 at 7:47am.

Here's a company (Suncor) which, despite a drop in earnings and the drop in oil prices, intends to move full speed ahead with its development projects. Obviously the exception to the rule.

biz.yahoo.com

EDIT: Don't forget, HAL scheduled to release earnings after the close.



To: sand wedge who wrote (19950)4/22/1998 8:50:00 AM
From: Teddy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
OIL and POLITICS
The Wall Street Journal -- April 22, 1998
Politics & Policy:

Gore Gets a Mouthful of
Foreign-Policy Expertise
With Turkmenistan, Kazakstan
and Azerbaijan

----

By Laurie Lande
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON -- As he supports President Clinton's agenda and
pursues his own, Vice President Al Gore is expected to woo labor unions,
minority voters and high-tech executives. But today he's courting an unlikely
constituency: the central Asian republic of Turkmenistan.

Mr. Gore will be front and center when Turkmen President Saparmurat
Niyazov signs oil-development contracts with big U.S. energy companies
and later receives a $750,000 U.S. government grant to explore the
feasibility of an oil-shipment pipeline underneath the Caspian Sea. It has
become familiar territory for the vice president, who in recent months has
overseen approximately $18 billion in oil deals during visits by the leaders of
Turkmenistan's Caspian region neighbors Kazakstan and Azerbaijan.

As obscure as these countries are to most Americans, their immense oil
reserves and strategic importance make them objects of intense interest
from U.S. energy companies and government policy makers alike. That
gives Mr. Gore plenty of economic and national-security reasons to focus
on relations with the former Soviet republics. At the same time, the effort
could also yield long-term political dividends as the vice president points
toward his own bid to succeed Mr. Clinton in 2000.

For one thing, events such as this afternoon's scheduled contract signing at
Blair House burnish Mr. Gore's foreign-policy resume. "The experience
allows Gore to bring to the table a set of skills no presidential candidate
usually has," says William White, a former Clinton administration Energy
Department official who now heads the Texas Democratic Party. Boosting
business interests in the region also helps to solidify Mr. Gore's "New
Democrat" credentials and reinforces his strong relations with America's
politically active pro-Israel community, which wants Caspian energy
reserves developed to counter the influence of Middle East sources.

Cultivating relations with his counterparts abroad is a major part of Mr.
Gore's diplomatic portfolio. Best known are his twice-yearly meetings with
Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, though their future was
thrown in doubt when Russian President Boris Yeltsin summarily fired Mr.
Chernomyrdin and other cabinet members last month. Mr. Gore has
nurtured similar ties in South Africa and Egypt.

But he has also, with much less public notice, invested lots of time with
former Soviet republics that most Americans have never heard of. His
outreach efforts include such arcane sounding entities as the
U.S.-Kazakstan Joint Commission, the U.S.-Ukraine Binational
Commission and a similar bilateral venture with Uzbekistan.

It's not hard to understand why. The Energy Department estimates that the
Caspian region's oil fields, still mostly untapped, could contain reserves of
up to 200 billion barrels, second in the world only to the Persian Gulf.
Adding to their strategic significance, central Asian republics offer the
possibility of an oil-transmission route that could bypass Iran, a leading U.S.
adversary in the Middle East.

"The commissions haven't been highly publicized, but they are an important
source of stability in our relationships with these countries," says Tony
Lake, Mr. Clinton's former national security adviser. He adds that they also
make Mr. Gore "familiar with the business issues" in the region, which
include encouraging former Soviet republics to adopt business-friendly legal
practices such as protection for foreign investment and fair
production-sharing agreements for U.S. oil producers.

Central Asian reserves are especially crucial to major American oil
companies, because U.S. policy bars them from doing business in such
energy-rich countries as Iran, Iraq and Libya. Consider the roster of firms
planning to link up with Turkmenistan's Mr. Niyazov during this week's visit:
Mobil Corp., which plans to sign a multimillion-dollar deal to develop
offshore reserves; Exxon Corp., which hopes to complete an exploration
agreement as well; Halliburton Co., which wants to sell the Turkmens
drilling equipment; and Western Atlas Inc., which wants to conduct oiland
gas-survey work.


The vice president's involvement "gives Gore credibility with these foreign
leaders, who control a sizable new source of oil supplies for the world,"
says Julia Nanay, a consultant specializing in the former Soviet Union at
Petroleum Finance Co. in Washington. In the process, she adds, Mr.
Gore's friendly exposure to U.S. oil companies could be a boon to his
future campaign fund-raising. Since 1995 alone, according to figures
compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, oil companies, their
political-action committees, and their executives have given about $28
million to federal candidates and the major political parties.

Aides to Mr. Gore minimize those potential benefits. "No one can
pronounce or spell those countries," quips Ronald Klain, the vice
president's chief of staff. "The political payoff, for the amount of time he's
spent on this issue, is small. It's part of his job."

At the same time, the administration's involvement with the former Soviet
republics and their oil riches carries risks as well as rewards. Sen. Sam
Brownback, who heads a foreign-relations subcommittee on Near East
affairs, complains that the administration has slighted human-rights concerns,
such as religious freedom, in the Caspian region. "We are seen as just being
interested in their oil," says the Kansas Republican, who just returned from
a visit to the region last week.

Meanwhile, a federal grand jury has been investigating whether White
House officials improperly assisted oil financier Roger Tamraz, who
donated $177,000 to the Democratic Party during the 1996 campaign
while trying to build support for his own proposed pipeline under the
Caspian Sea. Mr. Tamraz attended some White House events with Mr.
Clinton around the time of the donations, though he was blocked from one
meeting with the vice president after a key Gore adviser cautioned against
it.

Sen. Brownback, for his part, says Mr. Gore and other top administration
aides should pay more attention to the region, not less. So far, experts
credit the vice president with at least having encouraged the transition
toward a market economy in the former Soviet republics. "Gore's really
done a good job at changing the investment climate," says Laurent
Ruseckas, associate director of Caspian research at Cambridge Energy
Research Associates. "It can't hurt him politically."

---