To: WalleyB who wrote (14378 ) 4/22/1998 11:33:00 AM From: Zoltan! Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
Bush? A failed President who is still a team player. He plays for the Establishment. For that reason, Maureen Dowd wrote a column about two months ago in which she stated that the US needs a "maverick" President in office far more often. Maureen stated that all recent Presidents have achieved their office with the backing of "the Establishment", save the lone maverick, Ronald Reagan, who achieved office over their active opposition. Maureen shocked and surprised me by saying that she missed RR. (As did liberal Time pathfinder.com pathfinder.com @@lO74aAQAWXnZ0US9/time/time100/leaders/profile/reagan.htmlYou can argue that great moments call forth great leaders, that the '20s brought forth a Harding, but the dramatic and demanding '30s and '80s summoned an F.D.R. and a Reagan. In Reagan's case, there was also something else. It was that he didn't become President to reach some egocentric sense of personal destiny; he didn't need the presidency, and he didn't go for it because of some strange vanity, some weird desire to be loved or a need of power to fill the empty spaces within. He didn't want the presidency in order to be a big man. He wanted the presidency so that he could do big things. I think as we look back we will see him as the last gentleman of American politics. He was as courtly and well mannered as Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich are not. He was a person of dignity and weight, warmth and wit. The English say a gentleman is one who never insults another by accident, but Reagan took it a step further: he wouldn't insult another on purpose. For all that, there was of course his famous detachment. I never understood it, and neither, from what I've seen, did anyone else. It is true that when you worked for him, whether for two years or 20, he didn't care that much about your feelings. His saving grace--and it is a big one, a key one to his nature--is that he didn't care much about his feelings either. The cause was all, the effort to make the world calmer and the country freer was all. Reagan's achievements were adult achievements, but when I think of him now I think of the reaction he got from the young. It was as if some mutual sweetness were sensed on both sides. The man who ran speechwriting in the Reagan White House was Bently Elliott, and Ben's secretary was a woman in her early 20s named Donna. She adored Reagan. When he came back from long trips, when his helicopter landed on the White House lawn, the sound and whirr of the engine and blades would make our offices shake. We'd all stop and listen. Donna would call out, spoofing the mother in a '50s sitcom, "Daddy's home!" But you know, that's how I think a lot of people felt when Reagan was in the White House: Daddy's home. A wise and brave and responsible man is running things. And that's a good way to feel. Another memory. Ben Elliott went with Reagan on his trip to China in 1984. Reagan spoke everywhere, as the ruling gerontocracy watched and weighed. The elders did not notice that the young of China were falling in love with the American President (that love was expressed in part in Beijing's great square during the democracy movement of 1989). One day as Reagan spoke about the history of America and the nature of democracy, a young Chinese student, standing in the back and listening to the translation, turned to the American visitor, Ben Elliott. He didn't know much English, but he turned to Ben, pointed toward Reagan and said, eyes shining, "He is great Yankeeman." One great Yankeeman is exactly what he was, and is. Teddy Roosevelt was this century's other maverick President. George Will has also stated many times that George Bush's policies had far more in common with Slick's than Ron's. Remember, government spending and taxes took off under Bush's weak residency and there was genuine fear by the Bushies that Ron would refuse to endorse Bush in his abortive re-election effort.