Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (14398)	4/22/1998 12:47:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

There is no indication that Morris "has changed his story". Certainly when he worked for Clinton he didn't "go public" on those matters... Nonsense. Not too long ago he was busy explaining that Clinton had never hired private detectives to intimidate women.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (14398)	4/22/1998 1:00:00 PM
From: DScottD	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

Zolt, The issue isn't whether Morris changed his story; it is his credibility. He has been a paid shill (whore) for whoever he was working for at the time (a lot of the time for the Clintons, for sure) for so long that I have a hard time believing he has made this incredible transformation and is now illuminating us with the, um, unadulteryated truth. And the NY Post wouldn't publish anything if it wasn't true, right? If he said he had the same transformation you claim he has had, but was saying that "Clinton is indeed the victim of a vast right wing conspiracy and I have the evidence to prove it", you would denounce him as another Clintonista and question his motives. I agree with you that Slick and his operatives have done a nice job getting the public to believe this is only about sex.