Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (54529)	4/26/1998 2:46:00 PM
From: Pullin-GS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Nice reply! Did you think of that all by yourself? Another typical post of yours...consistent with your FUD and content-less posts. PS: How's that shoe-leather taste (as in foot in mouth)? PSS: Who the heck is Andy? PSS: And all those stocks you mention where eventually run-over by new technologies, not technology cloners such as the AMD copy-boys who try to take another company's (INTC) superior technology and pawn it off as being better. Have you ever wondered how a chip-cloner can stay in front of the technology curve when they have to WAIT for the other company to make something better before they can copy it??? Kinda puts AMD behing the pruduction curve by about a year or two. ;-) Could this be why AMD has not made a dime in ages? PSSS: Still waiting for your reply as to how you could get AMD300/100 = INTC300/100 when the very article you posted says otherwise<ROFL>. I suppose loosers only want to think they hear what their heart hopes to hear.;-) PSSSS: Investing in hope is a quick ticket to the poor-house. Score for today: INTC thread 2, Brian zippo.

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (54529)	4/26/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: Joey Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Brian. Wrong examples! re:Did you by anychance also invest in IBM in the 80s , Sony when it had the Betamax proprietary video cassettes and Apple when it had it's own comfortable monopoly ? These companies lost their dominant positions due to changes either in technologies or standards. IBM: cost/performance of mainframe computing eventually lost out to x86 PCs and RISC workstations connected via LANs. Also, IBM SNA model at the time (mid 80s) was proprietary vs. openness of PCs, TCP/IP, etc. Sony: failed to license Betamax, VHS becomes the standard Apple: failed to license MAC/OS, Windows on x86 becomes the standard. AMD/Cyrix/etc. are just clones. They add no value, and can only compete based on lower price to the market leader. They are NOT providing a new technology or developing their own standard. Intel will never be toppled unless AMD develops a new technology or standard which transforms the industry. K6-3D, Slot-A???? good luck! joey