Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (46236)	4/27/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: DJ Byrne	Respond to of 55532

tonto, Why are you selecting only a portion of the count? By saying that there was only 220 with less than a 1000, it could also be construed that there was 300 more with over a million plus. Why make this comment at all? please stop posting partial truths and either spit out the entire point your getting to or be quiet. Posting as a shareholder you are not helping anything, its time to stop. More of the games that MK played is becoming more obvious. dj

To: tonto who wrote (46236)	4/27/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: Nam Vu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Tonto, Thanks for the clarification. However, I still do not understand the message you were trying to convey in the post. From what I understand now, it is like me saying that out of 100 people in my study 100 had AIDS. What I failed to state is that my study was of AIDS patients. When you are so selective in the data set and pick out small sub-sets of data so, you can construe it to say anything you want. So what was the point? Here's another...500 people I know have less that $5 dollars to their name......there are all under 5 years old. 220 shareholders had less than 1000 shares.....are these people the ones that were on the bottom of the list if sorted by number of shares owned? It seems that by asking for the average in your post you were implying that according to these numbers the average would very low...say less that 5 shares? Again, I restate....I do not understand the post and if it is what I am gathering, then it was manipulative, and mis-leading. Nam