Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CURLEW LAKE RESOURCES (CWQ-VSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Vickers who wrote (262)	4/29/1998 10:35:00 PM
From: Dale Schwartzenhauer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 701

Hi Kevin, we continue to trade for about 1/3 of BEA, so we're inexorably linked whether we like it or not (definitely NOT!). No value for the Forum, Bacon Island, Cochise, Chestermere, waterflood projects or the NSR from BMG's gold project in Washington. Any one of these could be worth a couple of bucks in a reasonably good market with some underlying property activity. Today, we get zip for them due to our relationship to BEA. That's my opinion of it. I'd like to see all the TV properties pooled into a new entity that is spun off to shareholders of CWQ/BEA/STF so the remaining properties could be developed. The new unified entity would enjoy better opportunities for financing, promotion and operation including a US market listing if I had anything to do with it. I've been pushing CWQ to get a US market listing for years; they want the benefits but won't pay the cost. So, we continue to be at the mercy of Canadian underwriters, many of whom have less integrity than a common thief. Thanks for posting, Dale