SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SecularBull who wrote (39492)4/29/1998 11:51:00 AM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 176387
 
LoD -
You know how I hate to contradict you but the facts don't support your statements. Don't know the business week report you refer to but those guys have been wrong before... I took this data directly from the financial reports of Dell and CPQ (WSJ breifing book), using calendar 1997 since Dell's fiscal is offset 1 month.
Dell had revenue of 11,002K for the period, avg of 11,500 employees, yielding revenue/employee of 956K. CPQ had revenue of 23,614K, avg of 19,125 employees for revenue/employee of 1.23M. CPQ wins that race. 1st half was even more in CPQ's favor since 2nd half included Tandem which had lots of employees but little revenue.
If we look at income, Dell had 848K for the period, inc/employee was 73.7K. CPQ had 1,785K, inc/employee was 93.33K, CPQ wins here also.
Of course if we did that same snapshot now, Dell would be a lot closer on the income/employee (since CPQ gets to average in a zero for 1Q), but revenue per employee would still fall to CPQ.
As Paul has pointed out, this has to do with the number of employees answering phones at Dell - if they get to 100% Web orders that number should change a lot.