Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JSI who wrote (15779)	5/1/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: Kevin	Respond to of 31646

Legal mumble-jumble? ... (eom)

To: JSI who wrote (15779)	5/1/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: Joe Bilich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

I think they can say this, and come back later and say "we took the problem seriously, and have since discovered more...". ALso--one needs to remember that "material" is a tem that is open to interpretation. What is considered material to a given compeny with a long term view might well be considered material by shareholders, especially those who bought at what later proved to be the wrong time. Further, Coke or Bristol Myers are huge companies. They could spend an immense amount, by TAVA standards, without making much of a dent in their balance sheet. The question we should be asking is "will these Fortune 500 companies be spending amounts that are material TO TAVA?". The answer to this question could be YES even if the disclaimers in their annual reports are in fact true.