SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DJBEINO who wrote (32700)5/1/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: Dave Gahm  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Does anyone have any insight into MU's strategy here? It seems foolish, or maybe even desperate, to bring up SDRAM in this case. When can they file dumping charges for the 97-98 period?

The chaebols were closed today for a holiday and could not be reached for comment. Lawrence Walders, U.S. attorney for Hyundai, said the latest Micron complaint "was thrown into the case at the last minute and has no relevance." SDRAM modules only became an important item in the market after May 1, 1997, and aren't involved in the 12-month review period of the current case, ended April 30, 1997, he said.



To: DJBEINO who wrote (32700)5/1/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: Ed Beers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
At last, a reliable source for the cost to assemble a DIMM. $19
according to Micron (or their lawyer anyway).



To: DJBEINO who wrote (32700)5/2/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: John Graybill  Respond to of 53903
 
"They sold the chips and tossed in the assembly and testing for free, that's predatory." These claims are getting more desperate. Appleton's pursuit of Samsung is starting to remind me of Captain Ahab and the great white whale.