Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15831)	5/1/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: Stuart Schreiber	Respond to of 31646

Cheryl, as always, outstanding work. Only wish TAVA could afford you. Maybe I should start a TAVA shareholder's fund to hire you? stu

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15831)	5/1/1998 8:48:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 31646

Currently TAVA is listed in SI under "Software". There's a new category called "Year 2000 Stocks and Discussion" (Thanks to John Mansfield. And I was thinking, maybe that's where we should be: techstocks.com PLUS right now it's flagged as a new category techstocks.com And, it's featured here as a new category: techstocks.com From a "marketing" standpoint, it makes sense to make the change. Besides, none of the existing categories are truely descriptive. The "Y2K Impact on Stock Market & Society" thread has been today's #1 hot subject for the past few hours. Have to think that this new Y2K category had something to do with it. To be listed in this category, I just need to include "Y2K" in the title - could be at the very end. Sure wish "2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud" didn't pop up first, but there have been SO many great rebuttals - it actually works for us. What do you guys think? Should I do it, or shouldn't I? I personally like the idea ... for at least the next couple of years. Cheryl

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (15831)	5/3/1998 5:32:00 AM
From: R. Bond	Respond to of 31646

>>,,,,in over his head on this issue.<< Thanks, Cheryl, for the excellent report. Although we do get access to some of the irresponsible people who should be Y2K aware via the press, it's even more powerful to hear a tale firsthand which throws the spotlight on the 'view from the top'. "In over his head"? Yes. That's because he "doesn't want to know". The implications are obvious. He's part of a group who all follow the herd and don't make waves within their circle. IMHO. Don't count on them for any advice at this stage of the game. When thinking about Y2K fixes and TAVA I bear in mind what James Dines says, "Everything takes longer than expected." Holding. Cheers, Bond