SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Arcane Lore who wrote (64)5/3/1998 2:44:00 PM
From: hawkeye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3679
 
Thanks Arcane Lore for your post.

Does this mean that even if SLUP is able to demonstrate to the SEC that all of its contracts are in order and that its revenue projections are based on valid assumptions that SLUP still may not trade on the bulletin board?



To: Arcane Lore who wrote (64)5/3/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: Larry Garrison  Respond to of 3679
 
Super post, and thanks for the super links!!
I have learned a lot today!!



To: Arcane Lore who wrote (64)12/13/1999 3:05:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3679
 
From today's SEC Digest:

SEC SUES SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD. AND OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS FOR FRAUDULENT CONDUCT SPANNING FOUR YEARS

On December 13, the Commission filed a civil injunctive action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that senior officers and directors of Solucorp Industries Ltd., a Canadian company which develops, markets and licenses products used in decontaminating soil, engaged in a deliberate and systematic scheme to defraud investors over a four year period. The scheme involved senior management falsely claiming through press releases and other publicly disseminated materials that Solucorp had contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars when the contracts either did not exist or were subject to undisclosed material contingencies. Additionally, senior management falsified financial statements filed with the Commission and disseminated to the public during the period December 1997 through April 1999 by improperly recognizing license fees which were subject to material contingencies. Further, senior managers sold Solucorp securities while in possession of non-public inside information and failed to file or timely file insider trading reports with the Commission.

Charged in the action are Joseph S. Kemprowski, a former officer and director of, and currently consultant to, Solucorp; Peter R. Mantia, the president and a director of Solucorp; James G. Spartz, a vice president and a director of Solucorp; Robert Kuhn, a former vice president of Solucorp; Victor Herman, CPA, the former chief financial officer of Solucorp's two principal operating subsidiaries and the preparer of Solucorp's consolidated financial statements; Arle Pierro, a senior vice president and director of Solucorp; and W. Bryan Fair, a director of Solucorp. [SEC v. Solucorp Industries Ltd., et al., 99 Civ. 11965, WCC, SDNY] (LR-16388)

sec.gov



To: Arcane Lore who wrote (64)1/27/2003 4:21:41 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3679
 
From today's SEC Digest:

FORMER AUDITOR OF SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IS ENJOINED FROM VIOLATING EXCHANGE ACT SECTION 10A AND BARRED FROM APPEARING OR PRACTICING BEFORE THE COMMISSION FOR TWO YEARS

On January 16, the Commission obtained a final judgment against Glenn R. Ohlhauser, a Canadian Chartered Accountant and former engagement partner on audits of the financial statements of Solucorp Industries Ltd., a Yukon Territory corporation headquartered in West Nyack, New York that engages in environmental remediation. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered the final judgment against Ohlhauser. The judgment permanently enjoins Ohlhauser from violating Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by, among other things, failing to take the steps required by that section on detecting or otherwise becoming aware of information, during the course of auditing a public company, that an illegal act has or may have occurred. Without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations against him, Ohlhauser consented to the entry of the final judgment. (See Lit. Rel. No. 17951 // January 27, 2003)

The Commission's complaint in this case, which was filed in December 1999 and amended in October 2000 and September 2001, charged Ohlhauser with failing to take appropriate action on discovering possible illegal conduct during an audit of Solucorp's December 31, 1997 financial statements. The complaint, which also names Solucorp and certain of its current and former officers and directors as defendants, alleges that Solucorp's management backdated a license agreement in order to cover-up Solucorp's improper recognition during the quarter ended September 30, 1997, of $500,000 in license fees, or 40% of its revenues, and to materially overstate revenues for the six-month reporting period ended December 31, 1997. See LR-16388 (December 13, 1999). The complaint further alleges that, on being presented during the audit with the final license agreement, Ohlhauser reasonably concluded that the agreement appeared to have been backdated for improper accounting purposes. He allegedly failed, however, to take the
appropriate steps under Section 10A to determine, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the likelihood that an illegal act had occurred, and to disclose, or assure the disclosure of, any illegal acts that he uncovered. See LR- 16785 (October 31, 2000). The illegal acts at issue here included the commission of fraud by Solucorp's president, who is alleged to have purposefully backdated the license agreement for purposes of supporting Solucorp's improper revenue recognition.

In a related proceeding, the Commission today issued an administrative order pursuant to Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice that denies Ohlhauser the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, with a right to apply for reinstatement after two years. In addition to finding that Ohlhauser has been permanently enjoined as described above, the Commission finds in its Order that Ohlhauser engaged in improper professional conduct. This is based on Ohlhauser's failure to exercise professional skepticism and to gather competent evidential matter concerning the collectibility of license fees to afford a reasonable basis for the issuance of an unqualified audit report regarding Solucorp's December 31, 1997, financial statements. Ohlhauser, who admits to the Commission's finding that a final judgment was entered against him but neither admits nor denies the second finding of improper professional conduct, consented to the entry of the administrative order against him.

The case is still pending against the remaining defendants, Solucorp Industries Ltd., Joseph S. Kemprowski, Peter R. Mantia, James G. Spartz, Robert Kuhn, Victor Herman, Arle Pierro and W. Bryan Fair. (In the Matter of Glenn R. Ohlhauser, C.A., Rel. 34-47256; File No. 3-11018; SEC v. Solucorp Industries Ltd., et al., 99 Civ. 11965, S.D.N.Y., WCC; LR-17951)

sec.gov