Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pureblood who wrote (4484)	5/3/1998 11:13:00 PM
From: D LEE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

In the bank "today" means nothing to the question I have. That can change quicker than you can reach for it. Is the money legally earmarked "if the merger does not make it"? And this may be vastly different with each possible exit route. It is easy to remember changes in the merger plans, easy to forget the circumstances that may cause those changes. That's about all investors have to go on, which is nil. They have had all this time to plan, and anyone who works desires to work big. With 500,000 on the table, those involved don't think about using 499,000. They want it all because it is there. Over a small period of time, it is human nature to search excuses for deserving "all" even though "all they may actually contribute" may be very small. The earmarking issue should not be serious if they are serious about "an equitable merger". I believe there can be such a merger. Since we cannot know about WOTD, at least we can know about CVIA. So CVIA is not exposing information vital to the success of the merger by expressing the affairs of CVIA. One of those affairs would be "how is the money earmarked if there is an upset in the merger". (CVIA thus remaining a separate entity.) (poorly worded) Dave