SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Winstar Comm. (WCII) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steven Bowen who wrote (5693)5/3/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: wonk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12468
 
Steve:

You are wasting your breath (I guess that an oxymoron, OK you're abusing your fingers).

Jason is a trader (go back through his posts on other threads and you will see it). This is swamp things redux.

We're talking apples and oranges here. Longs are analyzing the fundamentals in a manner appropriate for the industry sector AND for a start-up company in that sector. Their bullish attitude is a consequence of that analysis. For this company, the only true risk for the longs is management execution.

Jason, as a trader, looks at those same fundamentals and sees great risk because it is likely that, by volume alone, his trades were weighted towards company's with earnings, tangible (versus intangible) assets, etc. Typical indices, when applied to a company such as WinStar, give misleading signals. One learns that through experience.

This debate about debt is ridiculous. I asked Jason to opine on an appropriate level of financial leverage for this company and got no response. (Undergraduate finance teaches the basics on choosing between debt and equity to fund a company. I haven't yet seen even that quality of response.) Therefore, he either knows the debt level is not unreasonable and is just twisting your tail or he does not know and is choosing not to display a lack of knowledge on the subject.

For my own purposes, when Jason writes about short term price movements and trading strategies to take advantage of those movements, I will consider it appropriately. Otherwise, I will grant little weight to his opinion since I have seen no evidence of financial sophistication or sector knowledge (in contrast to option trading where it appears he knows his stuff).



To: Steven Bowen who wrote (5693)5/4/1998 7:51:00 AM
From: James Fink  Respond to of 12468
 
<<You just keep telling us we can't make money on WinStar, and meanwhile the rest of us will just count the money we've already made.>>

Steven Bowen,

Your argument cited above is moronic. The past tells you nothing about the future. You and your swine cronies may have successfully played the "greater fool" game in the past, but you have demonstrated no reason why the greater fool game will work in the future.