SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J R KARY who wrote (12718)5/5/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Alomex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 

Scott doesn't the NASDQ count buy/sell as two shares ?

I knew somebody would come up with this mathematically illiterate argument (nothing personal, forward all complaints to your high-school teacher). This is the equivalent of thinking that things are cheaper in the UK because the number printed in the price tags (in pounds) is smaller than the number at your local K-mart.

You see, while it is true that NASDAQ double counts, it double counts equally every day. We are simply using two for one units.

So if you adjust the 85 million shares traded over $25 to 42.5 million shares, we must also adjust the 3.7 million shares traded today to 1.85 million.

And the resistance level, as expressed in trading days, is the same.



To: J R KARY who wrote (12718)5/5/1998 7:17:00 PM
From: Scott Crumley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Jim,

Scott doesn't the NASDQ count buy/sell as two shares ?

Yes they do, but the 4 day period in August represented over 50
million actual shares changing hands. That's a lot of shares for AAPL.

I agree that a lot of people bailed into tax selling, but I think a
sinificant portion came back in in January. Just check the spike on
January 2, below:

DATE CLOSING PRICE OPEN HIGH LOW VOLUME
-------- ------------- -------- -------- -------- -----------

1/21/98 18 7/8 18 3/4 19 1/16 18 9/16 1,698,300
1/20/98 19 1/8 19 1/16 19 5/16 18 5/8 2,156,800
1/16/98 18 13/16 19 7/16 19 7/16 18 11/16 2,199,600
1/15/98 19 3/16 19 3/16 19 3/4 18 5/8 4,993,500
1/14/98 19 3/4 19 7/8 19 15/16 19 1/4 5,261,300
1/13/98 19 1/2 18 5/8 19 5/8 18 1/2 5,686,200
1/12/98 18 1/4 17 7/16 18 5/8 17 1/8 4,610,700
1/09/98 18 3/16 18 1/8 19 3/8 17 1/2 7,915,600
1/08/98 18 3/16 17 7/16 18 5/8 16 15/16 6,915,800
1/07/98 17 1/2 18 13/16 19 17 5/16 9,300,200
1/06/98 18 15/16 15 15/16 20 14 3/4 16,189,500
1/05/98 15 7/8 16 1/2 16 9/16 15 3/16 5,820,300
1/02/98 16 1/4 13 5/8 16 1/4 13 1/2 6,411,700
12/31/97 13 1/8 13 1/8 13 5/8 12 15/16 3,628,200

AAPL spiked 3 points on Jan 2nd, the first trading session of 98'.
That was a Friday. The rally carried up to 19 over the next 9 trading
days, with around 73 million shares traded. I think a portion (but not
all) of this was people that had sold in 97' to take the loss.

I agree that the people buying in August were only buying because they
heard the magic word, "MicroSoft" (basically clueless, with the
exception of day traders). I imagine a lot of the folks on this thread
at that time were already in at between 13-19 and hopefully sold into
the rally.

I defer to your position on the bondholders, as you've taught me more
about AAPL's bond situation than anyone else on this thread (and I
appreciate it).

All in all, I'm not as pessimistic about the current situation as
Alomex, but I agree with him that most of the resistance we've seen up
til' now had a lot to do with the August situation. In the same vein,
I believe there are a lot investors that are hoping lightning will
strike twice, in that, a new Steve Jobs announcement will gap the
stock up 7 points, as it did in August. We all know how often
lightning strikes twice. In a sense, this works against us for
tomorrow and on May 11.

But Apple is in a much different (read better) place than it was in
August. We can't judge it in the same terms. If Steve has the right
stuff up his sleeve, then I think we'll at least go into the 30's in
the next week, and maybe more.

Regarding Gil's book, I take your point. Maybe I'll work a deal with
Eric or Travis.

Regards,

Scott