Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Electronic Contract Manufacture (ECM) Sector -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 18acastra who wrote (1499)	5/6/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: Joe Dancy	Respond to of 2542

Jabil gets more attention: RESEARCH ALERT - Jabil <JBL.N> started as buy NEW YORK, May 6 (Reuters) - Salomon Smith Barney said it initiated coverage of Jabil Circuit Inc. with a buy rating, saying the stock's recent price weakness was overdone. Jabil over the past five years in particular has posted consistent annual increases in revenue, earnings and return on equity. Despite possible near-term softness, Jabil remains well equipped and positioned to rebound as near-term issues abate. The 12-month target price was $53. Joe

To: 18acastra who wrote (1499)	5/6/1998 8:29:00 PM
From: rich evans	Respond to of 2542

Some interesting items in ALRN annual report/10k which might be worth exploring. They have doubled the assembly square feet. Adding a lot to the inner layer facility for their boards, And their inventory of raw material and wip is up 50%. If they maintain the same inventory turns and gross margins based on COGS, this would mean sales of 250 + million. Could be other reasons of course for inventory but it is intersting especially with the higher value of its competitors SANM. Commments anyone? I think I am the only ALRNER around here. Rich

To: 18acastra who wrote (1499)	5/7/1998 3:46:00 AM
From: Asymmetric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2542

Wall St. mulls Fed rate hike or margin adjustment (Some may perceive following as off-topic, but since margin debt rates and interest rates have such a huge effect on the market, I posted this to make sure everyone knows what is being considered. For what it's worth, Greenspan also had a 1 hour closed door meeting with Clinton last night. Overall market is ripe for a big sell-off, IMHO. Any 4 events will be the trigger: 1)Higher margin debt requirements (with Greenspan something is definitely afoot!). 2)Concern over worsening SE Asian situation 3)Employment beige book report on Friday. 4)Matt Drudge report that Justice Dept is going to drop a bombshell and initiate proceedings to bust up Microsoft.) ..........Cheers! Peter. (Caveat Emptor - I reserve the right as always to be totally and miserably wrong.) By Huw Jones NEW YORK, May 6 (Reuters) - A Federal Reserve rate hike would not spell disaster for Wall Street's bull run if investors viewed it as a pre-emptive strike rather than a scramble from behind the curve to curb inflation, analysts said. Raising rates is not the Fed's only option. The central bank could leave rates unchanged and focus instead on restraining asset inflation and raise margin requirements on stock trades as the central bank is entitled to, analysts cautioned. A higher margin could have a much bigger dampening impact in what many analysts see as a liquidity driven market. At this stage, the street would interpret an interest rate rise as a pre-emptive strike, analysts say. ''In the long run, that would be good for the stock market,'' said Pierre Ellis, senior economist at Primark Decision Economics. With U.S. inflation the lowest since the early 1960s, the Fed has no reason to introduce a series of rate hikes, analysts said. The strong U.S. economy would help counter the impact one-off hike on the stock market. Nevertheless, rate fears began stalking the corridors of Wall Street after news was leaked last week that the central bank had moved from a neutral to a tightening bias on rates at its March meeting. And, despite benign economic data since the leak, the jitters resurfaced again this week to stall blue chip momentum. Denmark's shock rate hike also put the prospect of higher European and U.S. rates higher up on the financial agenda. Stock investors now scrutinize economic data for any excuse the Fed could use to raise rates. The next key indicator is Friday's April non-farm payrolls. Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan will also speak at a banking conference in Chicago on Thursday. The Fed's next policy meeting is on May 19. It last raised short-term rates by 0.25 percent to 5.50 percent in March 1997. The key issue for stocks is how the 30-year Treasury bond yield perceives the move to raise rates, said Mark Vitner, vice president and economist at First Union Capital Markets Group. This would determine how much the yield moved up. ''If you see bond yields come up, then the stock market would have to trade at a lower price/earnings ratio (P/E or multiple),'' Vitner said. Stock prices move inversely with interest rates, so higher the interest rates would mean a lower multiple. ''Right now, it looks like an increase would be a pre-emptive step,'' Vitner said. ''But stock market is going to have a tougher time making the type of gains we have seen.'' The Standard & Poor's 500 index of the nation's biggest companies is trading on a 12-month forward P/E of about 22, up from about 16 a year ago. Over the same period, the long bond yield fell about one percent. Wednesday, the long bond was up 17/32 to yield 5.95 percent. ''If rates are increased, the P/E would not be knocked down that much because of the favorable business environment,'' Ellis said. Chuck Hill, director of research at First Call, which tracks corporate earnings, said the P/E would be knocked down initially after a rate hike. ''The bigger threat to P/E is if the Fed does something to the margin requirements, because the biggest concern at this point is asset inflation,'' Hill said. ''Interest rates are not the real threat to P/Es. Margin debt has gotten pretty high and there is no question there is some froth in valuations in general,'' Hill said. At present, buyers of stock need only put up half the amount of money needed to buy the shares, with the broker agrees to give credit for the rest. This 50 percent margin requirement, set by the Fed, has been unchanged since January 1974. Margin debt is at the highest level relative to GDP since the 1920s. Arthur Levitt, the Securities and Exchange Commission's chairman, agreed on Wednesday that margin debt is high. ''People are borrowing for some purposes that perhaps they would not have borrowed for in the past,'' Levitt told CNBC Television. ''It's a time to be cautious.'' Raising margins would cool the ''equity market froth'' without damaging the economy, said William Barker, chief investment strategist at Dain Rauscher. ''I think it's certainly a tool they have got to consider using,'' Barker said. ''But I don't think they will do it.''