SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (15065)5/7/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
Starr Counters Accusations
of Clinton Lawyers

6.53 p.m. ET (2253 GMT) May 7, 1998

By Larry Margasak, Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Launching an unusually blunt public
counteroffensive, Whitewater prosecutors accused
President Clinton's private attorneys Thursday of filing
reckless accusations in court and threatened to request
punishment by the chief U.S. district judge.

Jackie M. Bennett Jr., second-in-command to
Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, reacted harshly in
response to accusations from the Clinton lawyers that
prosecutors leaked a ruling rejecting executive privilege
invoked by the president. The Clinton lawyers had filed a
court motion asking prosecutors to show why they should
not be held in contempt for revealing a secret ruling.

"Although we owe you no courtesy after yesterday's abusive filing, we demand that you withdraw your motion by noon on Friday, May 8, 1998," Bennett wrote four private lawyers representing Clinton on executive privilege matters, and two presidential aides. "Otherwise we will seek appropriate relief from the court, including sanctions against each of the persons under whose names the motion was submitted."

The White House has gone to court before, accusing Starr's office of leaking sealed grand jury material to the news media. That matter also was kept secret by Chief U.S. District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson.

In ratcheting up the feud, Bennett separately wrote private Clinton lawyer David Kendall that the court motion was filed even though "you now have perfect knowledge of the source of the reports."

In a separate letter to the four attorneys, who joined the Kendall motion, Bennett wrote that "the allegations are reckless, irresponsible and false" - adding that Kendall knew "these reports (on the executive privilege ruling) emanated from the White House." ....

foxnews.com